4.5 Article

Evolution of public attitudes about mental illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA
卷 125, 期 6, 页码 440-452

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2012.01826.x

关键词

mental health literacy; stigma; trends; depression; schizophrenia; genetics

资金

  1. Janssen-Cilag
  2. Eli Lilly
  3. Novartis
  4. AstraZeneca
  5. SALUS-Institute for Trend-Research and Therapy Evaluation in Mental Health
  6. Pfizer
  7. GlaxoSmithKline
  8. Lundbeck

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Schomerus G, Schwahn C, Holzinger A, Corrigan PW, Grabe HJ, Carta MG, Angermeyer MC. Evolution of public attitudes about mental illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Objective: To explore whether the increase in knowledge about the biological correlates of mental disorders over the last decades has translated into improved public understanding of mental illness, increased readiness to seek mental health care and more tolerant attitudes towards mentally ill persons. Method: A systematic review of all studies on mental illness-related beliefs and attitudes in the general population published before 31 March 2011, examining the time trends of attitudes with a follow-up interval of at least 2 years and using national representative population samples. A subsample of methodologically homogeneous studies was further included in a meta-regression analysis of time trends. Results: Thirty-three reports on 16 studies on national time trends met our inclusion criteria, six of which were eligible for a meta-regression analysis. Two major trends emerged: there was a coherent trend to greater mental health literacy, in particular towards a biological model of mental illness, and greater acceptance of professional help for mental health problems. In contrast, however, no changes or even changes to the worse were observed regarding the attitudes towards people with mental illness. Conclusion: Increasing public understanding of the biological correlates of mental illness seems not to result in better social acceptance of persons with mental illness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据