4.5 Article

Evidence for the early clinical relevance of hallucinatory-delusional states in the general population

期刊

ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA
卷 127, 期 6, 页码 482-493

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/acps.12010

关键词

psychotic disorders; schizophrenia; epidemiology; delusions; hallucinations; risk factors

资金

  1. Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red de Salud Mental, CIBERSAM Spain

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nuevo R, Van Os J, Arango C, Chatterji S, Ayuso-Mateos JL. Evidence for the early clinical relevance of hallucinatory-delusional states in the general population. Objective: To analyze, in a general population sample, clustering of delusional and hallucinatory experiences in relation to environmental exposures and clinical parameters. Method: General population-based household surveys of randomly selected adults between 18 and 65years of age were carried out. Setting: 52 countries participating in the World Health Organization's World Health Survey were included. Participants: 225842 subjects (55.6% women), from nationally representative samples, with an individual response rate of 98.5% within households participated. Results: Compared with isolated delusions and hallucinations, co-occurrence of the two phenomena was associated with poorer outcome including worse general health and functioning status (OR=0.93; 95% CI: 0.920.93), greater severity of symptoms (OR=2.5 95% CI: 2.03.0), higher probability of lifetime diagnosis of psychotic disorder (OR=12.9; 95% CI: 11.514.4), lifetime treatment for psychotic disorder (OR=19.7; 95% CI: 17.322.5), and depression during the last 12months (OR=11.6; 95% CI: 10.912.4). Co-occurrence was also associated with adversity and hearing problems (OR=2.0; 95% CI: 1.82.3). Conclusion: The results suggest that the co-occurrence of hallucinations and delusions in populations is not random but instead can be seen, compared with either phenomenon in isolation, as the result of more etiologic loading leading to a more severe clinical state.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据