4.5 Article

Salinity improves chilling resistance in Suaeda salsa

期刊

ACTA PHYSIOLOGIAE PLANTARUM
卷 36, 期 7, 页码 1823-1830

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11738-014-1555-3

关键词

Chilling stress; Halophyte; Photoinhibition; Salinity; Suaeda salsa; Unsaturated fatty acids

资金

  1. NSFC (National Natural Science Research Foundation of China) [31300205, 31370420]
  2. Natural Science Research Foundation of Shandong [ZR2013CQ009]
  3. Program for Scientific research innovation team in colleges and universities of Shandong Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Suaeda salsa L., a C3 euhalophytic herb, is native to saline soils, demonstrates high resistance to salinity stress. The effect of chilling stress on S. salsa under high salinity, particularly the change in unsaturated fatty acid content within membrane lipids, has not been investigated. After a 12 h chilling treatment (4 A degrees C) performed under low irradiance (100 mu mol m(-2) s(-1)), the chlorophyll contents, maximal photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (F (v)/F (m)) and actual PSII efficiency (I broken vertical bar PSII) were determined. These measurements were significantly decreased in S. salsa leaves in the absence of salt treatment yet there were no significant changes with a 200 mM NaCl treatment. Chlorophyll contents, F (v)/F (m) and I broken vertical bar PSII in S. salsa under 200 mM NaCl were higher than those without salt treatment. The unsaturated fatty acid content and the double bond index (DBI) of major membrane lipids of monogalactosyldiacylglycerols, digalactosyldiacylglycerols (DGDG), sulphoquinovosyldiacylglycerols and phosphatidylglycerols (PG) significantly increased following the chilling treatment (4 A degrees C) (with 12 h of low irradiance and 200 mM of NaCl). The DBI of DGDG and PG was decreased in the absence of the salt treatment. These results suggest that in the euhalophyte S. salsa, a 200 mM NaCl treatment increases chilling tolerance under conditions of low irradiance (100 mu mol m(-2) s(-1)).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据