4.5 Article

Proteomic analysis of plumules and coleoptiles in maize between hybrids and their corresponding inbred lines

期刊

ACTA PHYSIOLOGIAE PLANTARUM
卷 36, 期 2, 页码 355-370

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11738-013-1417-4

关键词

Maize; Heterosis; Nonadditive protein; Plumule and coleoptile

资金

  1. National Nature Foundation of China [31000715]
  2. National Project 973 of China [2012CB723001]
  3. Postdoctoral Foundation of China [20100480852]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The plumule and coleoptile influence the emergence and vigor of the seedling and demonstrate distinct heterosis during maize (Zea mays L.) development. Comparative two-dimensional analysis was performed on plumules and coleoptiles from 3.5 days-cultivated seedlings of five widely used hybrids in China and their corresponding parental lines to dissect the genetic mechanism of heterosis. Compared to their parental lines, 64 % (2,127/3,310) of the differentially expressed proteins were nonadditively accumulated in the five hybrids. Up-regulated above the high parent, a similar expression pattern in all five tested hybrids, was the major expression pattern accounting for 68 % (1,446/2,127) nonadditive proteins. Forty-two nonadditive protein spots with significant differences between the hybrids and their parental lines were analyzed by mass spectra. Homology searches separated them into six groups with two abundant functional classes of cell detoxification (33 %) and metabolism (26 %), implying their importance for heterotic manifestation of the different hybrids at 3.5 days-cultivated seedling stage. The differential accumulation and expression of herbicide safener protein 1 in cell detoxification implied that exploration of the molecular mechanism of heterosis should be studied in a systematic network. Four potential functional polymorphisms were identified in SBP1 gene providing possible interpretation for the differential expression of SBP1 at transcriptional and translational levels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据