4.5 Article

Silicon enhances photochemical efficiency and adjusts mineral nutrient absorption in Magnaporthe oryzae infected rice plants

期刊

ACTA PHYSIOLOGIAE PLANTARUM
卷 33, 期 3, 页码 675-682

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11738-010-0588-5

关键词

Rice; Blast; Silicon; Magnaporthe oryzae; Mineral nutrient contents; Chlorophyll fluorescence

资金

  1. National Key Basic Research Funds of China [2006CB1002006]
  2. Natural Science Foundation [31070396]
  3. earmarked fund for Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Silicon (Si) has been verified to play an important role in enhancing plant resistance against pathogens, but the exact mechanisms remain unclear. Two near-isogenic lines of rice (Oryza sativa L.), CO39 (blast susceptible), and C101LAC (Pi-1) (blast resistant), were hydroponically grown to study the effects of exogenous silicon application on the changes of disease incidence, mineral nutrient concentrations, chlorophyll content, and photochemical efficiency in Magnaporthe oryzae infected rice plants. Si amendment in nutrient solution at a concentration of 2.0 mM significantly reduced the disease index of rice plants of CO39 and C101LAC (Pi-1). Silicon application alone had no effects on mineral nutrient contents, chlorophyll content, maximum/potential quantum efficiency (F (v)/F (m)), and the maximum primary yield (F (v)/F (0)) of photochemistry of PS II in healthy rice leaves. M. oryzae inoculation significantly increased the content of K, Na, Ca, Mg, Fe, and reduced the value of F (v)/F (0) and F (v)/F (m) in rice leaves. However, Si treatment suppressed M. oryzae induced increase of mineral nutrient contents, and significantly increased F (v)/F (0) and F (v)/F (m) value compared with Si-deficient infected plants. These results suggest that silicon-enhanced resistance to rice blast is associated with an enhancement of photochemical efficiency and adjustment of mineral nutrient absorption in M. oryzae-infected rice plants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据