4.5 Article

Rhizobial strain involvement in symbiosis efficiency of chickpea-rhizobia under drought stress: plant growth, nitrogen fixation and antioxidant enzyme activities

期刊

ACTA PHYSIOLOGIAE PLANTARUM
卷 33, 期 4, 页码 1075-1083

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11738-010-0635-2

关键词

Chickpea; Drought stress; Nitrogen fixation; Antioxidant enzymes; Mesorhizobium ciceri

资金

  1. Faculty of Postgraduate Studies, University of Isfahan, Iran

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chickpea plants were inoculated with two strains of Mesorhizobium ciceri: local strain (C-15) and non-local strain (CP-36) in order to evaluate plant growth parameters, activities of nitrogenase and antioxidant enzymes under drought stress as well as control condition within 15 days of imposition of drought stress. Biomass production, nodulation, nitrogen fixation and antioxidant enzyme activities under drought condition were compared. Under control condition, symbiotic efficiency in symbiosis formed by C-15 was higher than that in symbiosis derived by CP-36. Although drought stress decreased shoot dry weight, root dry weight, nodule dry weight and nitrogen fixation in both symbioses, the rate of decline in plants inoculated with CP-36 was higher than that in symbiosis chickpea with C-15. Therefore, symbioses showed different tolerance level under drought condition which was essentially correlated with symbiotic performance at non-stressful conditions. Under drought stress, nodular peroxidase (POX) activity increased in both symbioses but was higher in nodules produced by C-15. Ascorbate peroxidase (APX) increased significantly in nodules of symbiosis of chickpea with C-15. Catalase (CAT) and glutation reductase (GR) declined in both symbioses which decline extent in symbiosis with C-15 was lower than that in the nodules of CP-36. These results suggested contribution of rhizobial partner in enhancing the tolerance of symbioses to drought stress, which was related with the increase of antioxidant enzyme activities (APX and POX) under drought conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据