4.5 Article

Corticosteroid suppression of lipoxin A4 and leukotriene B4 from alveolar macrophages in severe asthma

期刊

RESPIRATORY RESEARCH
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1465-9921-11-71

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [HL-69155, HL69349, AI068084]
  2. NHLBI
  3. Brigham and Women's Hospital-Elliot Israel
  4. Cleveland Clinic Foundation-Serpil C. Erzurum
  5. MRC [G0700900] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Medical Research Council [G0700900] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0509-10080] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: An imbalance in the generation of pro-inflammatory leukotrienes, and counter-regulatory lipoxins is present in severe asthma. We measured leukotriene B-4 (LTB4), and lipoxin A(4) (LXA(4)) production by alveolar macrophages (AMs) and studied the impact of corticosteroids. Methods: AMs obtained by fiberoptic bronchoscopy from 14 non-asthmatics, 12 non-severe and 11 severe asthmatics were stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 10 mu g/ml) with or without dexamethasone (10(-6)M). LTB4 and LXA(4) were measured by enzyme immunoassay. Results: LXA4 biosynthesis was decreased from severe asthma AMs compared to non-severe (p < 0.05) and normal subjects (p < 0.001). LXA(4) induced by LPS was highest in normal subjects and lowest in severe asthmatics (p < 0.01). Basal levels of LTB4 were decreased in severe asthmatics compared to normal subjects (p < 0.05), but not to non-severe asthma. LPS-induced LTB4 was increased in severe asthma compared to non-severe asthma (p < 0.05). Dexamethasone inhibited LPS-induced LTB4 and LXA(4), with lesser suppression of LTB4 in severe asthma patients (p < 0.05). There was a significant correlation between LPS-induced LXA(4) and FEV1 (% predicted) (r(s) = 0.60; p < 0.01). Conclusions: Decreased LXA(4) and increased LTB4 generation plus impaired corticosteroid sensitivity of LPS-induced LTB4 but not of LXA(4) support a role for AMs in establishing a pro-inflammatory balance in severe asthma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据