4.7 Article

Restoration of autophagic flux in myocardial tissues is required for cardioprotection of sevoflurane postconditioning in rats

期刊

ACTA PHARMACOLOGICA SINICA
卷 35, 期 6, 页码 758-769

出版社

NATURE PUBL GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/aps.2014.20

关键词

sevoflurane; inhalation anesthetics; postconditioning; heart; ischemia-reperfusion injury; cardioprotection; autophagy; chloroquine

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81070098, 81200109]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: Sevoflurane postconditioning (SpostC) has been shown to protect the heart from ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury. In this study, we examined whether SpostC affected autophagic flux in myocardial tissues that contributed to its cardioprotective effects in rats following acute I/R injury. Methods: SD rats underwent 30 min of left anterior descending coronary artery ligation followed by 120 min of reperfusion. The rats were subjected to inhalation of 2.4% (v/v) sevoflurane during the first 5 min of reperfusion, and chloroquine (10 mg/kg, ip) was injected 1 h before I/R. Myocardial infarct size was estimated using TIC staining. Autophagosomes in myocardial tissues were detected under TEM. Expression of LC3B-II, beclin-1, p62/SQSTM1, cathepsin B, caspase-3 and cleaved PARP was assessed using Western blot analysis. Plasma cardiac troponin I was measured using ELISA. Cardiomyocyte apoptosis was evaluated with TUNEL staining. Results: I/R procedure produced severe myocardium infarct and apoptosis accompanied by markedly increased number of autophagosomes, as well as increased levels of LC3B-II, beclin-1 and. p62 in myocardial tissues. SpostC significantly reduced infarct size, attenuated myocardial apoptosis, restored intact autophagic flux and improved the lysosomal function in myocardial tissues. Administration of chloroquine that blocked autophagic flux abrogated the cardioprotective effects of SpostC. Conclusion: SpostC exerts its cardioprotective effects in rats following I/R injury via restoring autophagic flux in myocardial tissues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据