4.7 Article

Water Oxidation Catalysis by Birnessite@Iron Oxide Core-Shell Nanocomposites

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 54, 期 6, 页码 2734-2741

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ic502908w

关键词

-

资金

  1. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey [113Z009]
  2. EU Erasmus Programme
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [KU 2885/1-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, magnetic nanocomposite particles were prepared for water oxidation reactions. The studied catalysts consist of maghemite (gamma-Fe2O3), magnetite (Fe3O4), and manganese ferrite (MnFe2O4) nanoparticles as cores coated in situ with birnessite-type manganese oxide shells and were characterized by X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, thermal, chemical, and surface analyses, and magnetic measurements. The particles were found to be of nearly spherical core-shell architectures with average diameter of 150 nm. Water oxidation catalysis was examined using Ce4+ as the sacrificial oxidant. All core-shell particles were found to be active water oxidation catalysts. However, the activity was found to depend on a variety of factors like the type of iron oxide core, the structure and composition of the shell, the coating characteristics, and the surface properties. Catalysts containing magnetite and manganese ferrite as core materials displayed higher catalytic activities per manganese ion (2650 or 3150 mmolO(2) mol(Mn)(-1) h(-1)) or per mass than nanoiron oxides (no activity) or birnessite alone (1850 mmolO(2) mol(Mn)(-1) h(-1)). This indicates synergistic effects between the MnOx shell and the FeOx core of the composites and proves the potential of the presented core-shell approach for further catalyst optimization. Additionally, the FeOx cores of the particles allow magnetic recovery of the catalyst and might also be beneficial for applications in water-oxidizing anodes because the incorporation of iron might enhance the overall conductivity of the material.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据