4.7 Article

Discovery of novel PTP1B inhibitors with antihyperglycemic activity

期刊

ACTA PHARMACOLOGICA SINICA
卷 31, 期 8, 页码 1005-1012

出版社

SHANGHAI INST MATERIA MEDICA
DOI: 10.1038/aps.2010.81

关键词

protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs); diabetes; antihyperglycemic activity; drug screening

资金

  1. 863 High-Tech Research and Development Program of China [2006AA02Z315, 2008AA02Z105]
  2. National S&T Major Projects Key New Drug Creation and Manufacturing Program of China [2009ZX09301-001, 2009ZX09302-001, 2009ZX09501-010]
  3. Public Service Platform Foundation of Shanghai Ministry of Science and Technology [08DZ2291300, 09DZ2291200]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: To discover and optimize a series of novel PTP1B inhibitors containing a thiazolidinone-substituted biphenyl scaffold and to further evaluate the inhibitory effects of these compounds in vitro and in vivo. Methods: A total of 36 thiazolidinone substituted biphenyl scaffold derivatives were prepared. An in vitro biological evaluation was done by Enzyme-based assay. The in vivo efficacy of 7Fb as an antihyperglycemic agent was evaluated in a BKS db/db diabetic mouse model with a dose of 50 mg.kg(-1).d(-1) for 4 weeks. Results: The in vitro biological evaluation showed that compounds 7Fb and 7Fc could increase the insulin-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of IR beta in CHO/hIR cells. In in vivo experiments, compound 7Fb significantly lowered the postprandial blood glucose, from 29.4 +/- 1.2 mmol/L with the vehicle to 24.7 +/- 0.6 mmol/L (P<0.01), and the fasting blood glucose from 27.3 +/- 1.5 mmol/L with the vehicle to 23.6 +/- 1.2 mmol/L (P<0.05). Conclusion: A novel series of compounds were discovered to be PTP1B inhibitors. Among them, compound 7Fb significantly lowered the postprandial and fasting glucose levels, and the blood glucose level declined more rapidly than in metformin-treated mice. Thus, 7Fb may be a potential lead compound for developing new agents for the treatment of type II diabetes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据