4.6 Article

Simultaneous Measurement of Tear Film Dynamics Using Wavefront Sensor and Optical Coherence Tomography

期刊

INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE
卷 51, 期 7, 页码 3441-3448

出版社

ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-4430

关键词

-

资金

  1. Finger Lakes Eye Tissue Bank
  2. Japan Eye Bank Association
  3. Research to Prevent Blindness

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE. To investigate tear film dynamics using simultaneous measurements of ocular aberrations and lower tear meniscus. METHODS. Simultaneous measurements of wavefront aberration and lower tear meniscus were performed for 11 normal eyes and 7 eyes with short tear film break-up time (SBUT) dry eye, with a tear film break-up time shorter than 5 seconds, using a wavefront sensor and an anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT). During the measurement, the subjects were instructed to blink every 6 seconds for a total of 30 seconds. From the measured aberration, root mean square (RMS) wavefront error and volume modulation transfer function (vMTF) induced by changes in tear film dynamics were calculated for a 5-mm pupil. Lower tear meniscus height (TMH) and area (TMA) were estimated from the cross-sectional OCT images of lower tear meniscus. RESULTS. There was a positive correlation between RMS and tear meniscus dimensions and a negative correlation between vMTF and tear meniscus in both groups. There were moderate negative correlations between the postblink initial RMS change and baseline TMH (R = -0.61) and TMA (R = -0.54) in SBUT dry eyes that were stronger than in normal eyes (R = -0.37, R = -0.38). CONCLUSIONS. Tear meniscus dimensions increase with RMS over time, and tear quantity before blink has a significant role in maintaining initial optical integrity, especially in SBUT dry eye. Simultaneous measurement of optical quality and tear meniscus has the potential to improve understanding of tear stability in normal eyes and dry eyes. (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010; 51:3441-3448) DOI:10.1167/iovs.09-4430

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据