4.5 Article

Association between paternal smoking and nutritional status of under-five children attending Diarrhoeal Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh

期刊

ACTA PAEDIATRICA
卷 100, 期 3, 页码 390-395

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2010.02067.x

关键词

Bangladesh; Nutritional status; Smoking; Under-five children

资金

  1. ICDDR, B
  2. Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID)
  3. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh
  4. Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA)
  5. Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands (EKN)
  6. Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA)
  7. Department for International Development, UK (DFID)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: The study aimed at determining whether there is an association between paternal smoking and nutritional status of children aged 0-59 months. Furthermore, the study looked at the presence of any nutritional differentials within different socio-economic groups. Methods: Secondary analysis of data on children aged 0-59 months enrolled in the Hospital Surveillance System of International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka Hospital, Bangladesh, during 1996-2006. Results: Among 13,555 under-five children, fathers of 49% were smokers. In multivariate logistic regression models adjusting for potential confounders, fathers' smoking was significantly associated with increased risk of moderate underweight (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.08-1.25), severe underweight (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.06-1.26), moderate stunting (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.06-1.23) and severe stunting (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.03-1.25). In middle and lower socio-economic strata, risk of moderate and severe child malnutrition was found to be significantly increased in the group where the father was a smoker. Conclusion: Results indicate that there is an association between fathers' smoking and malnutrition of under-five children particularly in lower socio-economic group. A possible mechanism - if this association is causal - may be through a negative effect on family economy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据