4.6 Article

NTS adenosine A2a receptors inhibit the cardiopulmonary chemoreflex control of regional sympathetic outputs via a GABAergic mechanism

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00838.2014

关键词

nucleus of the solitary tract; purinergic receptors; renal nerve; adrenal nerve; lumbar nerve; gamma-aminobutyric acid

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL-67814]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adenosine is a powerful central neuromodulator acting via opposing A(1) (inhibitor) and A(2a) (activator) receptors. However, in the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS), both adenosine receptor subtypes attenuate cardiopulmonary chemoreflex (CCR) sympathoinhibition of renal, adrenal, and lumbar sympathetic nerve activity and attenuate reflex decreases in arterial pressure and heart rate. Adenosine A(1) receptors inhibit glutamatergic transmission in the CCR pathway, whereas adenosine A(2a) receptors most likely facilitate release of an unknown inhibitory neurotransmitter, which, in turn, inhibits the CCR. We hypothesized that adenosine A2a receptors inhibit the CCR via facilitation of GABA release in the NTS. In urethane-chloralose-anesthetized rats (n = 51), we compared regional sympathetic responses evoked by stimulation of the CCR with right atrial injections of the 5-HT3 receptor agonist phenylbiguanide (1-8 mu g/kg) before and after selective stimulation of NTS adenosine A(2a) receptors [microinjections into the NTS of CGS-21680 (20 pmol/50 nl)] preceded by blockade of GABA(A) or GABA(B) receptors in the NTS [bicuculline (10 pmol/100 nl) or SCH-50911 (1 nmol/100 nl)]. Blockade of GABAA receptors virtually abolished adenosine A(2a) receptor-mediated inhibition of the CCR. GABA(B) receptors had much weaker but significant effects. These effects were similar for the different sympathetic outputs. We conclude that stimulation of NTS adenosine A(2a) receptors inhibits CCR-evoked hemodynamic and regional sympathetic reflex responses via a GABA-ergic mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据