4.7 Article

Redox Noninnocence of the Bridge in Copper(II) Salophen and Bis(oxamato) Complexes

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 54, 期 18, 页码 9013-9026

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b01285

关键词

-

资金

  1. CNRS (France)
  2. Labex ARCANE (France) [ANR-11-LABX-0003-01]
  3. NSERC (Canada)
  4. CFI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two square-planar copper(II) complexes of 1,2-bis(2-hydroxy-3,5-di-tert-butylbenzimino)-4,5-bis-(dimethylamino)benzene (1) and N-[4,5-bis(dimethylamino)-2-(oxalylamino)benzene]oxamate (2(2-)) were prepared. The crystal structures of the proligands H2L1 and Et2H2L2, as well as the corresponding complexes, are reported. The proligands each display a one-electron-oxidation wave, which is assigned to oxidation of the bis(dimethylamino)benzene moiety into a pi radical. Complexes 1 and 2(2-) exhibit reversible one-electron-oxidation waves in their cyclic voltammograms (E-1/2(1) = 0.14 and E-1/2(2) = 0.31 V for 1 and E-1/2(1) = 0.47 V vs Fc(+)/Fc for 2(2-)). The first process corresponds to oxidation of the bis(dimethylamino)benzene central ring into a pi radical, while the second process for 1 is ascribed to oxidation of the pi radical into an alpha-diiminoquinone. The one-electron-oxidized species 1(+) and 2(-) exhibit intense visible near-IR absorptions, which are diagnostic of pi radicals. They display a triplet signal in their electron paramagnetic resonance spectra, which stem from magnetic coupling between the ligand-radical spin and the copper(II) spin. The zero-field-splitting parameters are larger for 2(-) than 1(+) because of greater delocalization of the spin density onto the coordinated amidato N atoms. Density functional theory calculations support a pi-radical nature of the one-electron-oxidized complexes, as well as S = 1 ground spin states. The electrogenerated 1(2+) comprises a closed-shell diiminoquinone ligand coordinated to a copper(II) metal center. Both 1 and 2 catalyze the aerobic oxidation of benzyl alcohol, albeit with different yields.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据