4.5 Article

PCR-hybridization after sonication improves diagnosis of implant-related infection

期刊

ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA
卷 83, 期 3, 页码 299-304

出版社

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2012.693019

关键词

-

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science [FUNCOAT-CSD2008-00023]
  2. Comunidad de Madrid [S2009/MAT-1472]
  3. Capio Research Foundation [2009-1694]
  4. Comunidad de Madrid
  5. FundaciOn Conchita Rabago-de-Jimenez-Daz
  6. Pfizer
  7. Novartis
  8. Wyeth

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose We wanted to improve the diagnosis of implant-related infection using molecular biological techniques after sonication. Methods We studied 258 retrieved implant components (185 prosthetic implants and 73 osteosynthesis implants) from 126 patients. 47 patients had a clinical diagnosis of infection (108 components) and 79 patients did not (150 components). The fluids from sonication of retrieved implants were tested in culture and were also analyzed using a modified commercial PCR kit for detection of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria (Geno-Type BC; Hain Lifescience) after extraction of the DNA. Results 38 of 47 patients with a clinical diagnosis of infection were also diagnosed as being infected using culture and/or PCR (35 by culture alone). Also, 24 patients of the 79 cases with no clinical diagnosis of infection were identified microbiologically as being infected (4 by culture, 16 by PCR, and 4 by both culture and PCR). Comparing culture and PCR, positive culture results were obtained in 28 of the 79 patients and positive PCR results were obtained in 35. There were 21 discordant results in patients who were originally clinically diagnosed as being infected and 28 discordant results in patients who had no clinical diagnosis of infection. Interpretation For prosthetic joint infections and relative to culture, molecular detection can increase (by one tenth) the number of patients diagnosed as having an infection. Positive results from patients who have no clinical diagnosis of infection must be interpreted carefully.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据