4.1 Article

Factors affecting the presence and abundance of generalist ectoparasites in nests of three sympatric hole-nesting bird species

期刊

ACTA ORNITHOLOGICA
卷 48, 期 1, 页码 39-54

出版社

MUSEUM & INST ZOOLOGY
DOI: 10.3161/000164513X669982

关键词

anti-parasite behaviour; blowflies; mites; ectoparasites; grooming; nest composition; nest sanitation; nest humidity; Pied Flycatcher; Blue Tit; Nuthatch

资金

  1. Spanish MICINN [CGL2010-19233-C03-02]
  2. MICINN
  3. CSIC
  4. MECD

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nesting cavities constitute micro-environments very likely to be colonized by ectoparasites which feed on blood of the incubating female and the nestlings. Given the negative impact of ectoparasites on nestlings there will be selection on hosts to minimize ectoparasite loads through behavioural defenses. We have addressed the implications of ectoparasitism in three sympatric avian cavity-nesters, namely Pied Flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca, Blue Tits Cyanistes caeruleus and Nuthatches Sitta europaea, to explore if differences in prevalence and abundance of generalist ectoparasites (blowflies, fleas and mites) can be related to interspecific differences in their nest size, nest composition and cavity microclimate. Furthermore, we have aimed at detecting if interspecific variation in the incidence and intensity of anti-parasite behaviours is a consequence of the abundance of ectoparasites. Differences in nest composition among host species appear not to be the main factor explaining ectoparasite loads, while nest size, breeding phenology, brood size and nest-cavity micro-climate may affect them in different ways for each host-parasite association. Behavioural defenses against parasites are exhibited by all host species but are more intense in the host species with the highest infestation levels (Blue Tits). This study shows different sources of variation in associations between three sympatric avian cavity-nesters and their generalist ectoparasites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据