4.0 Article

Variations of electron density and temperature in ionosphere based on the DEMETER ISL data

期刊

EARTHQUAKE SCIENCE
卷 23, 期 4, 页码 349-355

出版社

SEISMOLOGICAL SOC CHINA & INST GEOPHYSICS, CHINA EARTHQUAKE ADMIN
DOI: 10.1007/s11589-010-0732-8

关键词

seasonal variation; annual variation; spatial distribution; N-e; T-e; DEMETER satellite

资金

  1. National Key Technology Research and Development Program [2008BAC35B02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Observations of the Langmuir Probe Instrument (ISL, Instrument Sonde de Langmuir) onboard the DEMETER satellite during four years from 2006 to 2009 were used to analyze the tempo-spatial variations of electron density (Ne) and temperature (T-e) in the ionosphere. Twenty four research bins with each covering an area with 10 degrees in longitude and 2 degrees in latitude were selected to study the spatial distributions of N-e and T-e. The results indicate that both N-e and T-e have strong annual variations in the topside ionosphere at 660 km altitude. The semiannual anomaly and equinoctial asymmetry which are usually well known as the features of F-layer also exist in the topside ionosphere at low-and mid-latitudes. The yearly variation of N-e is opposite to the peak electron density of the F2-layer (NmF2) at higher latitudes in daytime and both are similar in nighttime. Also the yearly variations of T-e at low-latitude are contrary to that at 600 km in daytime and similar in nighttime. An interesting feature of nighttime T-e at low-latitude is an obvious annual variation in the northern hemisphere and semiannual variation in the southern hemisphere. The yearly variations of T-e in daytime have negative and positive correlation with N-e at mid-and high-latitudes, respectively. Both N-e and T-e in the neighborhood bins at the same latitude have a high correlation. In ionospheric events analyzing, this information may help to understand the characteristics of the variation and to distinguish the reliable abnormality from the normal background map.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据