4.4 Article

The impact of first eye cataract surgery on mental health contacts for depression and/or anxiety: a population-based study using linked data

期刊

ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA
卷 91, 期 6, 页码 e445-e449

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/aos.12124

关键词

ageing; anxiety; depression; epidemiology

资金

  1. Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Cataract is the leading cause of reversible blindness worldwide, and the incidence of cataract surgery is projected to increase as the population ages. Gaining an understanding of the effects of cataract surgery on a range of health outcomes is important for maintaining the health and safety of older adults. Methods: A before and after cohort study was conducted using the Western Australian Hospital Morbidity Data System, Mental Health Information System and the Western Australian Death Registry. Results: Of the 21110 patients who underwent cataract surgery in one eye only, 295 had mental health contacts for depression and/or anxiety 1year before (n=158) or 1year after (n=137) surgery. Results from Poisson generalized estimating equations showed a significant decrease of 18.80% (p0.001) in the number of mental health contacts for depression and/or anxiety the year after cataract surgery after accounting for potential confounding factors. A 27.46% increase in mental health contacts the year after cataract surgery was reported by women compared with men (95% CI: 1.08-1.50). Those living in remote areas had less contact with mental health services compared with those living in metropolitan areas (adjusted risk ratio 0.62, 95% CI: 0.46-0.84). The corresponding reduction in health care costs for treatment of depression and/or anxiety was 28%. Conclusion: Further research should be conducted to collect information on the utilization of health care resources not captured in this study, namely community-based services, visits to general practitioners and/or emergency departments as well as medication usage such as antidepressants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据