4.4 Article

Keratoconus in 18 pairs of twins

期刊

ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA
卷 90, 期 6, 页码 e482-e486

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2012.02448.x

关键词

concordance; dizygotic; genetics; genotyping; keratoconus; monozygotic; twin study

资金

  1. Department of Health through National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) [BMRC 089]
  2. Moorfields Eye Hospital Special Trustees
  3. Public Health Agency [RRG/3240/05] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

. Purpose: To describe the concordance of keratoconus in 18 sets of twins. Methods: Thirteen monozygotic (MZ) and five dizygotic (DZ) pairs of twins were identified during an investigation of familial keratoconus. We used 16 forensic microsatellite markers to confirm the zygosity of same sex twins. Patients and available relatives were examined for signs of keratoconus using corneal topography. For each pair of twins, the severity of keratoconus in each eye was graded according to the steepest keratometry value and the average difference in score between the MZ and DZ twins compared. Results: All of the MZ twins and four of the five DZ twins were concordant for keratoconus but with differences in age of onset and severity of disease. The subjective age of onset of keratoconus tended to be earlier in the MZ twins (16.4 years, SD 4.66) than in the DZ twins (20.3 years, SD 7.55) (p = 0.086). Additional relatives with keratoconus were identified in two (16%) of the families with MZ twins and in three (60%) of the families of DZ twins. The mean difference in severity scores was 1.4 (SD 1.73) for the MZ twins and 3.0 (SD 1.00) for the DZ twins (p = 0.035). Conclusion: This data provide evidence that the severity of keratoconus is more concordant in MZ than in DZ twins. The results support the currently accepted hypothesis of an important genetic contribution towards the pathogenesis of keratoconus, but suggest that there is also an environmental effect on the expression of disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据