4.4 Article

Analysis of diabetic vitreopathy with dynamic light scattering spectroscopy - problems and solutions related to photon correlation

期刊

ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA
卷 90, 期 3, 页码 e173-e178

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2011.02308.x

关键词

diabetes; diabetic vitreo-retinopathy; dynamic light scattering spectroscopy; photon-correlation spectroscopy; quasi-elastic light scattering spectroscopy

资金

  1. Haag-Streit International

向作者/读者索取更多资源

. Purpose: To explore the molecular alterations of the vitreous by dynamic light scattering (DLS) spectroscopy (quasi-elastic light scattering spectroscopy, photon-correlation spectroscopy) in normals and in patients afflicted with various degrees of non-proliferative and with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Methods: Dynamic light scattering spectroscopy was employed to analyze the vitreous of normals and of patients with diabetes non-invasively to estimate both the sizes and diffusion coefficients of mobile macromolecules and/or microparticles. Results: Abnormal molecular behaviour of vitreous molecules was observed in patients with diabetes afflicted with various degrees of diabetic vitreo-retinopathy. In the non-proliferative (background) retinopathy, both the diameters of the microparticles increase and the diffusion constants decrease significantly and progressively as the diabetic disease progresses. In the proliferative phase, a significant trend in the direction of smaller particles and greater diffusion constants is evident. These behaviours could also be interpreted as an increase in the viscosity of the intermolecular substance in the first case and as a decrease in the second. Conclusions: The vitreous in normals and even more so in diabetics with diabetic vitreo-retinopathy is optically a highly non-isotropic, multidispersive structure, making an optical analysis difficult. Advanced, but available models and technology, however, permits a major step forward in the optical analysis of the normal and the diseased vitreous.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据