4.4 Article

Intravitreal triamcinolone, bevacizumab and pegaptanib for occult choroidal neovascularization

期刊

ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA
卷 88, 期 8, 页码 e305-e310

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2010.02021.x

关键词

age-related macular degeneration; anti-VEGF; as needed treatment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To evaluate best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and foveal thickness (FT) changes in occult subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) from age-related macular degeneration (AMD) after intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB, 1.25 mg/0.05 ml), pegaptanib (IVP, 0.3 mg/0.09 ml) and triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA, 4 mg/0.1 ml) injected on an as needed basis. Methods: Retrospective, interventional, comparative study. BCVA (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study LogMAR) and FT by optical coherence tomography (OCT) were evaluated during 12 months from first treatment. Patients were retreated if signs of neovascular activity were still present on angiography or OCT. Results: Forty-eight eyes received IVB, 43 eyes received IVP, 52 eyes received IVTA. BCVA and FT at baseline were 1.22 +/- 0.49 LogMAR and 410.2 +/- 41.83 mu m in the IVB group, 1.25 +/- 0.43 LogMAR and 452.3 +/- 44.83 mu m in the IVP group and 1.31 +/- 0.4 LogMAR and 456.6 +/- 48.27 mu m in the IVTA group. BCVA and FT improved in the three groups during follow-up. A significantly greater improvement of BCVA was present at month-3, month-6 and at month-12 in the IVB and IVP groups (p = 0.01). Improvement of FT was greater in the IVTA group at month-3 (p = 0.02), while it was greater in the anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) groups at month-6 and month-12 (p = 0.01). A postoperative increase of intraocular pressure was detected in 9/52 (17.3%) eyes treated with IVTA, and in two cases it was resistant to topical therapy. Conclusion: Intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF drugs administered on an as needed basis for AMD-related occult CNVs provided functional and anatomic improvement during 12 months of follow-up.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据