4.7 Article

The dark flow induced small-scale kinetic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2010.00899.x

关键词

cosmology: observations; cosmology: theory; large-scale structure of Universe

资金

  1. Chinese academy of science
  2. national science foundation of China [10821302, 10973027]
  3. CAS/SAFEA
  4. 973 program [2007CB815401]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, Kashlinsky et al. reported a discovery of a similar to 10(3) km s(-1) bulk flow of the Universe out to z similar or equal to 0.3, through the dark flow induced cosmic microwave background (CMB) dipole in directions of clusters. We point out that, if this dark flow exists, it will also induce observable CMB temperature fluctuations at multipole l similar to 10(3), through modulation of the inhomogeneous electron distribution on the uniform dark flow. The induced small-scale kinetic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) effect will reach similar to 1 mu K-2 at multipole 10(3) less than or similar to l less than or similar to 10(4), only a factor of similar to 2 smaller than the conventional kinetic SZ effect. Furthermore, it will be correlated with the large-scale structure (LSS) and its correlation with Two-Micron All-Sky Survey (2MASS) galaxy distribution reaches 0.3 mu K at l = 10(3), under a directional dependent optimal weighting scheme. We estimate that, Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe plus 2MASS should already be able to detect this dark flow induced small-scale kinetic SZ effect with similar to 6 sigma confidence. Deeper galaxy surveys such as the Sloan Digital Sky Survey can further improve the measurement. Planck plus existing galaxy surveys can reach greater than or similar to 14 sigma detection. Existing CMB-LSS cross-correlation measurements shall be reanalysed to test the existence of the dark flow and, if it exists, shall be used to eliminate possible bias on the integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect measurement through the CMB-LSS cross-correlation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据