4.4 Article

FilMINT: An Outer Approximation-Based Solver for Convex Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Programs

期刊

INFORMS JOURNAL ON COMPUTING
卷 22, 期 4, 页码 555-567

出版社

INFORMS
DOI: 10.1287/ijoc.1090.0373

关键词

mixed-integer nonlinear programming; outer approximation; LP/NLP-based branch and bound

资金

  1. Mathematical, Information, and Computational Sciences Division of the Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research, Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy [W-31-109-ENG-38]
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) [CMMI-0522796, CCF-0830153]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-08ER25861, DE-FG02-09ER25869]
  4. IBM
  5. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  6. Division of Computing and Communication Foundations [830153] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We describe a new solver for convex mixed-integer nonlinear programs (MINLPs) that implements a linearization-based algorithm. The solver is based on an algorithm of Quesada and Grossmann [Quesada, I., I. E. Grossmann. 1992. An LP/NLP based branch-and-bound algorithm for convex MINLP optimization problems. Comput. Chemical Engrg. 16(10-11) 937-947] that avoids the complete re-solution of a master mixed-integer linear program (MILP) by adding new linearizations at open nodes of the branch-and-bound tree whenever an integer solution is found. The new solver, FilMINT, combines the MINTO branch-and-cut framework for MILP with filterSQP to solve the nonlinear programs that arise as subproblems in the algorithm. The MINTO framework allows us to easily employ cutting planes, primal heuristics, and other well-known MILP enhancements for MINLPs. We present detailed computational experiments that show the benefit of such advanced MILP techniques. We offer new suggestions for generating and managing linearizations that are shown to be efficient on a wide range of MINLPs. By carefully incorporating and tuning all these enhancements, an effective solver for convex MINLPs is constructed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据