4.4 Article

Autosomal dominant pericentral retinal dystrophy caused by a novel missense mutation in the TOPORS gene

期刊

ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA
卷 88, 期 3, 页码 323-328

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01465.x

关键词

autosomal dominant inheritance; electroretinography; missense mutation; pericentral retinal dystrophy; retinitis pigmentosa; TOPORS

资金

  1. Norwegian Association of the Blind
  2. Retinitis Pigmentosa Association in Norway
  3. Novartis Medical Company
  4. Schiotz Foundation and Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: This study aimed to identify the genetic cause of autosomal dominant pericentral retinal dystrophy (adPRD) in a large Norwegian family with 35 affected members. Methods: The family was characterized by clinical ophthalmological examination along with fundus photography, dark adaptometry and electroretinography. We performed a genome-wide linkage analysis followed by sequencing of a candidate gene to identify the mutation causing the disease. Results: The ophthalmological examinations revealed an atypical form of retinitis pigmentosa (RP), which we prefer to call adPRD. Compared with classical RP, this phenotype has a favourable prognosis. Linkage analysis showed a linkage peak covering the most recently reported adRP gene TOPORS. This gene was sequenced in 19 family members and a novel missense mutation, c.1205a > c, resulting in an amino acid substitution p.Q402P, was detected in all affected members. The mutation showed complete co-segregation with the disease in this family, with a LOD score of 7.3. It is located in a highly conserved region and alignment with the appropriate DNA sequence from other species shows complete conservation of this amino acid. The mutation was not detected in 207 healthy, unrelated controls of Norwegian origin. Conclusions: We present a novel mutation in the TOPORS gene co-segregating with a distinct phenotype of adPRD in a large Norwegian family.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据