期刊
ORGANIZATION STUDIES
卷 31, 期 9-10, 页码 1229-1255出版社
SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0170840610374395
关键词
constructivist epistemological paradigms; sciences of the artificial; design sciences; interpretive methods; rigor
类别
The so-called rigor-relevance gap appears unbridgeable in the classical view of organization science, which is based on the physical sciences' model. Constructivist scholars have also pointed out a certain inadequacy of this model of science for organization research, but they have not offered an explicit, alternative model of science. Responding to this lack, this paper brings together the two separate paradigmatic perspectives of constructivist epistemologies and of organizational design science, and shows how they could jointly constitute the ingredients of a constructivism-founded scientific paradigm for organization research. Further, the paper highlights that, in this constructivist view of organizational design science, knowledge can be generated and used in ways that are mutually enriching for academia and practice.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据