4.4 Article

Squamous cell carcinoma of the hypopharynx: Single-institution outcome analysis of a large cohort of patients treated with primary non-surgical approaches

期刊

ACTA ONCOLOGICA
卷 48, 期 4, 页码 541-548

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02841860802488839

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction. Hypopharyngeal cancers have extensive submucosal spread, high risk of nodal involvement and relatively high propensity of distant metastases. Contemporary paradigms for hypopharyngeal cancers aim to maximize loco-regional control while attempting to preserve laryngo-pharyngeal form and function. Aims. To retrospectively review outcome of large cohort of patients with hypopharyngeal cancers treated with curative intent radiotherapy with or without systemic chemotherapy in an academic tertiary referral centre. Material and methods. Medical records of patients with hypopharyneal cancers treated with primary non-surgical approaches over a 15-year period were reviewed retrospectively. Loco-regional control (LRC) and disease-free survival (DFS) were considered as outcome measures. Results. Electronic search of database identified 501 patients with hypopharyngeal cancers treated with definitive radiotherapy. The median age was 55 years (range 20-87 years) and median radiotherapy dose 70 Gy (range 5.4-72 Gy). With a mean follow-up period of 22 months (median 12 months), the 3-year LRC and DFS was 47.1% and 40.9% respectively. Stage (T-stage, N-stage, overall stage grouping), and age influenced outcome significantly. The 3-year LRC for T1-T2 disease was 49.7% versus 43.1% for T3-T4 stage (p = 0.056). The 3-year DFS was 49.4% and 36.9% respectively (p = 0.014). The 3-year LRC and DFS for N0; N1; and N2-3 disease was 57.3% 54.3%; 40.5% 35.3%; and 33% 27% respectively with highly significant p-values. Conclusion. This is an outcome analysis of the largest cohort of patients with hypopharyngeal cancers managed with primary non-surgical approaches. Stage and age remain the most important determinants of outcome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据