4.3 Article

Would species richness estimators change the observed species area relationship?

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.actao.2008.09.003

关键词

Species-area relationship (SAR); Non-parametric species richness estimators; Standardized surveys; Azores; Epigean arthropods; Canopy arthropods; Bryophytes

类别

资金

  1. Cartografia e Inventariacao dos Artropodes Endemicos dos Aqores [17.01 - 080203]
  2. European Community programme INTERREG III B
  3. Portuguese FCT [BPD/20809/2004]
  4. UK Natural Environment Research Council
  5. CITA A
  6. Natural Environment Research Council [cpb010001] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. NERC [cpb010001] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We evaluate whether the description of the species area relationship (SAR) can be improved by using richness estimates instead of observed richness values. To do this, we use three independent datasets gathered with standardized survey methods from the native laurisilva forest of the Azorean archipelago, encompassing different distributional extent and biological groups: soil epigean arthropods at eight forest fragments in Terceira Island, canopy arthropods inhabiting Juniperus brevifolia at 16 forest fragments of six different islands, and bryophytes of seven forest fragments from Terceira and Pico islands. Species richness values were estimated for each forest fragment using seven non-parametric estimators (ACE, ICE, Chao1, Chao2, Jackknife1, Jackknife2 and Bootstrap; five in the case of bryophytes). These estimates were fitted to classical log-log species-area curves and the intercept, slope and goodness of fit of these curves were compared with those obtained from the observed species richness values to determine if significant differences appear in these parameters. We hypothesized that the intercepts would be higher in the estimated data sets compared with the observed data, as estimated richness values are typically higher than observed values. we found partial support for the hypothesis - intercepts of the SAR obtained from estimated richness values were significantly higher in the case of epigean arthropods and bryophyte datasets. In contrast, the slope and goodness of fit obtained with estimated values were not significantly different from those obtained from observed species richness in all groups, although a few small differences appeared. We conclude that, although little is gained using these estimators if data come from standardized surveys, their estimations could be used to analyze macroecological relationships with nonstandardized observed data, provided that survey incompleteness and/or unevenness are also taken into account. (C) 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据