4.1 Article

Postpartum oral health parameters in women with preterm birth

期刊

ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA
卷 66, 期 6, 页码 334-341

出版社

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.1080/00016350802307620

关键词

Oral health status; periodontal micro-organisms; pregnancy complications

资金

  1. Helsinki University Central Hospital [TYH2119, TI020Y0003]
  2. Finnish Association of Health Centre Dentists
  3. American Heart Association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. It has been suggested that poor oral health and periodontal disease, in particular, associate with adverse birth outcomes. However, previous reports on the topic are conflicting. The objective of the present cross-sectional study was therefore to compare the oral health parameters of a racially and socio-economically homogeneous group of women who gave birth before 259 gestational days (37 weeks) with those of women who went full-term. Material and Methods. We studied various dental parameters, including prevalence of dental caries, gingival bleeding on probing, the probing periodontal pocket depths, and the carriage of periodontal pathogens in 328 all-Caucasian women with singleton births. Seventy-seven of the women had preterm births, while 251 had full-term. Dental data were recorded within 2 days postpartum and analyzed with data from medical history, prenatal care, and delivery records. Results. Preterm mothers had more dental caries (93.5%) than full-term mothers (85.3%) when assessed as carious teeth in the mouth (p=0.06). In clinical and microbiological periodontal health parameters, however, no differences could be seen between the preterm and full-term mothers. Primiparity, low weight-gain, and antimicrobial drug use during pregnancy were the significant predictors for preterm birth. Conclusions. Although we cannot make any causal linkage, the oral health parameters were no different in women who experienced preterm births compared with those who had full-term births in this cohort. Only established systemic risk factors explained the preterm birth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据