4.7 Article

Some consistency measures of extended hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations

期刊

INFORMATION SCIENCES
卷 297, 期 -, 页码 316-331

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2014.10.047

关键词

Group decision making; Extended hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set; Extended hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relation; Consistency measure; Preference relation graph

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61273209]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Linguistic preference relations (LPRs) enable decision makers to express preferences by pair-wise comparisons in qualitative setting. The fundamental aspect of LPRs is to measure the degrees of consistency when applying them in decision making. Extended hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets (EHFLTSs) are a powerful tool for modeling uncertain linguistic information in group decision making. Based on which we first present the concept of extended hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations (EHFLPRs), and then develop the additive consistency measure and the weak consistency measure respectively. Furthermore, in order to solve the consistency problem by the perspective of graphs, two algorithms are proposed based on two kinds of predefined graphs, i.e., the hesitant preference graphs and the symmetric hesitant preference graph. The selective algorithm selects the arcs with the highest additive consistency level from the symmetric hesitant preference graph and constructs a LPR. While the broken circle algorithm removes the arcs from circular triads of the hesitant preference graph, it makes the EHFLPR with weak consistency and divides the EHFLPR into several possible LPRs satisfying weak consistency. This paper therefore explores a visible interpretation of consistency measures. The rationality of the proposed algorithms is verified by several examples, and some related issues are also discussed. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据