4.4 Article

Distribution patterns of appendicularians and copepods and their relationship on the northwest continental shelf of South China Sea during summer

期刊

ACTA OCEANOLOGICA SINICA
卷 31, 期 5, 页码 135-145

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13131-012-0243-7

关键词

appendicularians; copepods; abundance; distribution; South China Sea

资金

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KZCX2-YW-Q07]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31101619, 41276159, 41130855]
  3. Chinese Offshore Investigation and Assessment [908-01-ST08]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The potential suppression of copepods on appendicularians was found in field and experimental conditions. The abundance and distribution of appendicularians and planktonic copepods were studied with reference to their correlations during summer on the northwest continental shelf of the South China Sea (SCS). Based on the topography and water mass of the surveyed region, it was divided into three sub-regions: Region I (inshore waters of the east Leizhou Peninsula) with low temperature, salinity and high chlorophyll a (Chl a) concentration, Region II (inshore waters of the east and southeast Hainan Island) with low temperature, high salinity and moderate Chl a concentration and Region III (offshore waters from the Leizhou Peninsula to Hainan Island) with high temperature, high salinity and low Chl a concentration. The species richness of appendicularians and copepods increased from the inshore to offshore waters, and high values were observed in Region III. The distribution of appendicularian and copepod abundance decreased generally from the inshore to offshore waters, with the highest values at Region I. Our results suggest that the distribution patterns of appendicularians and copepods differed significantly, as a result of the influence of physical and biological factors. The negative impact of pelagic copepods on appendicularians was not found based on in situ data in the northwest continental shelf of SCS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据