4.5 Article

Epidemiology of stillbirth in low-middle income countries: A Global Network Study

期刊

ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA
卷 90, 期 12, 页码 1379-1385

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01275.x

关键词

Developing countries; intrapartum stillbirth; stillbirth

资金

  1. NIH, Global Network for Women's and Children's Health Research [U01 HD040477, U01, HD0434475, U01 HD043464, U01 HD040657, U01 HD042372, U01 HD040607, U01 HD040636]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. To determine population-based stillbirth rates and to determine whether the timing and maturity of the stillbirths suggest a high proportion of potentially preventable deaths. Design. Prospective observational study. Setting. Communities in six low-income countries (Democratic Republic of Congo, Kenya, Zambia, Guatemala, India, and Pakistan) and one site in a mid-income country (Argentina). Population. Pregnant women residing in the study communities. Methods. Over a five-year period, in selected catchment areas, using multiple methodologies, trained study staff obtained pregnancy outcomes on each delivery in their area. Main outcome measures. Pregnancy outcome, stillbirth characteristics. Results. Outcomes of 195 400 deliveries were included. Stillbirth rates ranged from 32 per 1 000 in Pakistan to 8 per 1 000 births in Argentina. Three-fourths (76%) of stillbirth offspring were not macerated, 63% were =37 weeks and 48% weighed 2 500g or more. Across all sites, women with no education, of high and low parity, of older age, and without access to antenatal care were at significantly greater risk for stillbirth (p<0.001). Compared to those delivered by a physician, women delivered by nurses and traditional birth attendants had a lower risk of stillbirth. Conclusions. In these low-middle income countries, most stillbirth offspring were not macerated, were reported as =37 weeks gestation, and almost half weighed at least 2 500g. With access to better medical care, especially in the intrapartum period, many of these stillbirths could likely be prevented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据