4.5 Article

Disparities in Neighborhood Food Environments: Implications of Measurement Strategies

期刊

ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY
卷 86, 期 4, 页码 409-430

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2010.01084.x

关键词

food environment; food desert; spatial accessibility; GIS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Public health researchers have begun to map the neighborhood food environment and examine its association with the risk of overweight and obesity. Some argue that food deserts-areas with little or no provision of fresh produce and other healthy food-may contribute to disparities in obesity, diabetes, and related health problems. While research on neighborhood food environments has taken advantage of more technically sophisticated ways to assess distance and density, in general, it has not considered how individual or neighborhood conditions might modify physical distance and thereby affect patterns of spatial accessibility. This study carried out a series of sensitivity analyses to illustrate the effects on the measurement of disparities in food environments of adjusting for cross-neighborhood variation in vehicle ownership rates, public transit access, and impediments to pedestrian travel, such as crime and poor traffic safety. The analysis used geographic information systems data for New York City supermarkets, fruit and vegetable markets, and farmers' markets and employed both kernel density and distance measures. We found that adjusting for vehicle ownership and crime tended to increase measured disparities in access to supermarkets by neighborhood race/ethnicity and income, while adjusting for public transit and traffic safety tended to narrow these disparities. Further, considering fruit and vegetable markets and farmers' markets, as well as supermarkets, increased the density of healthy food outlets, especially in neighborhoods with high concentrations of Hispanics, Asians, and foreign-born residents and in high-poverty neighborhoods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据