4.5 Review

Helicobacter pylori infection and hyperemesis gravidarum: a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies

期刊

ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA
卷 88, 期 11, 页码 1190-1200

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.3109/00016340903284927

关键词

Helicobacter pylori; hyperemesis gravidarum; systematic review; meta-analysis; case-control study

资金

  1. Helse Sor/Ost, Norway

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. To summarize the evidence from epidemiological studies examining the association between Helicobacter pylori infection and hyperemesis gravidarum. Design. Systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies. Material and methods. We searched the Medline/PubMed, Embase, Cinahl, ISI Web of Science and Biological Abstracts databases from 1966 to 17 June 2008 and finally Google Scholar. A total of 25 case-control studies were identified. Both fixed-effect and random-effect models were used to synthesize the results of individual studies. The Cochran Q, tau(2) of between-study variance and index of heterogeneity (I-2) were used to evaluate heterogeneity. Heterogeneity between studies was examined by subgroup and random effect meta-regression analyses. Publication bias was evaluated. Results. Publication bias was not observed. The random model pooled estimate was odds ratio = 3.32, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 2.25-4.90. A high heterogeneity was pinpointed (I-2 = 80 %, 95 % CI: 65-89). Subgroup analysis and meta-regression showed a weaker association in studies with a clear definition of hyperemesis gravidarum compared to studies without this condition, and weaker association in recent studies compared to earlier studies. Meta-regression showed that these two study characteristics explained 40% of heterogeneity between studies. Conclusions. Exposure to H. pylori appears to be associated with an increased risk of hyperemesis gravidarum. The residual heterogeneity might have different reasons. Given the high prevalence of H. pylori, the public health consequence of H. pylori with regard to hyperemesis gravidarum may be important.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据