4.5 Article

Placenta weight in pre-eclampsia

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS
DOI: 10.1080/00016340802056178

关键词

pre-eclampsia; placenta; placenta weight; pregnancy; length of gestation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. Preterm and term pre-eclampsia may differ in etiology. This could be reflected in differences in placenta weight. Therefore, we compared placenta weight in pregnancies with preterm or term pre-eclampsia to placenta weight in pregnancies without pre-eclampsia. Design. Population study. Setting. Medical Birth Registry of Norway. Population. All singleton pregnancies in Norway from 1999 through 2004 delivered at or after 21 weeks' gestation (n =317,688). Methods. Placenta weight in pregnancies without pre-eclampsia (n =304,875) was compared to placenta weight in pregnancies with preterm pre-eclampsia (delivery before week 37 of pregnancy, n =3,070) and term pre-eclampsia (delivery on or after week 37 of pregnancy, n =9,743). Placenta weight z-scores were calculated to adjust for offspring sex and length of gestation, and grouped in tenths. Placenta weight according to pre-eclampsia status is presented as proportions within each tenth. Main outcome measures. Pre-eclampsia status. Results. In preterm pre-eclampsia, placentas were over-represented in the two lowest (33.8%; 95% CI 32.1-35.5) and under-represented in the two highest (13.1%. 95% CI 11.9-14.3) tenths of placenta weight compared to pregnancies without pre-eclampsia (20%). In term pre-eclampsia, placentas were over-represented in the two lowest (22.0%; 95% CI 21.2-22.8) and the two highest (22.7%; 95% CI 21.9-23.6) placenta weight groups. Mean placenta weight z-score was higher in term pre-eclampsia compared to pregnancies without pre-eclampsia. Conclusions. Small placentas were associated with pre-eclampsia, and more strongly with preterm than term pre-eclampsia. In term pre-eclampsia, the association with placenta weight was u-shaped, yielding higher proportions of both low and high placenta weight compared to pregnancies without pre-eclampsia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据