4.1 Article

Clinicians' Attitudes Towards the Use of Computerized Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (cCBT) with Children and Adolescents

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL AND COGNITIVE PSYCHOTHERAPY
卷 38, 期 5, 页码 545-560

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1352465810000421

关键词

Computer; CBT; attitudes; children; adolescents; clinicians

资金

  1. Department of Health [PB-PG-0407-13049] Funding Source: Medline
  2. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [PB-PG-0407-13049] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)
  3. National Institute for Health Research [PB-PG-0407-13049] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Research has begun to examine the effectiveness of computerized cognitive behaviour therapy (cCBT) with children and adolescents. Although cCBT appears promising, the attitudes of clinicians towards this type of intervention with children and young people have not been assessed, yet these are important in determining when and if cCBT will be offered. Aims: To survey clinicians' attitudes towards cCBT with children and adolescents. Method: A self-report questionnaire was completed by 43 mental health professionals attending a conference. Results: Clinicians were cautious but generally positive about the use of cCBT with children and adolescents, particularly for the delivery of prevention programmes and in the treatment of mild/moderate problems. Few felt that cCBT should be available freely online without any professional support. Indeed, the lack of a therapeutic relationship and professional support were identified as the biggest problems, whilst the potential to use cCBT at home was the greatest advantage identified. Conclusions: This survey suggests that clinicians are generally positive about the use of cCBT with children and adolescents for the prevention and treatment of mild/moderate problems. Further research is required to address clinicians' concerns about the effectiveness of cCBT for more substantial problems and the level of therapeutic support required.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据