4.6 Article

Qualitative and Quantitative Morphologic Changes in the Vasculature and Extracellular Matrix of the Prelaminar Optic Nerve Head in Eyes with POAG

期刊

INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE
卷 51, 期 10, 页码 5083-5091

出版社

ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-5101

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB 539]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE. To analyze the vasculature and extracellular matrix changes in the prelaminar region (PreLR) of the optic nerve head (ONH) and in the peripapillary sclera of eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and age-matched control eyes. METHODS. In histologic sagittal sections of 46 eyes with POAG and 45 control eyes (donor ages, 20-96 years), the peripapillary sclera and penetrating vessels were investigated ultrastructurally and with antibodies against elastin, podocalyxin, and alpha-actin. Within the PreLR, the number and density of capillaries and the thickness of their connective tissue sheaths (CTSs) were quantified. The composition of the CTS was analyzed by using antibodies against collagen types I, III, IV, and VI, and elastin. Areas within the PreLR containing capillaries with thick or thin CTSs were determined. RESULTS. There were no glaucomatous changes in the peripapillary elastic fibers and in the arterial capillaries in the periphery of the PreLR. In the center of the PreLR, the capillaries gained a CTS that was significantly thicker in POAG eyes than in control eyes, and the area containing capillaries with thick CTSs was significantly larger. These data did not correlate with axon counts. CONCLUSIONS. Lack of glaucomatous changes in elastic fibers of the scleral suspension of the ONH seems to prevent occlusion of penetrating vessels. In the PreLR, thickening of the capillary CTS and enlargement of the area containing capillaries with thickened CTS could increase diffusion time and may impair nutrition of the neuronal tissue. (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:5083-5091) DOI:10.1167/iovs.09-5101

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据