4.6 Article

Differential clinicopathologic and genetic features of late-onset amnestic dementias

期刊

ACTA NEUROPATHOLOGICA
卷 128, 期 3, 页码 411-421

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00401-014-1302-2

关键词

Hippocampal sclerosis; Alzheimer's disease; Neuropathology; Neurofibrillary tangles; TDP-43; GRN; TMEM106B; APOE

资金

  1. Einstein Aging Study [P01 AG03949]
  2. Mayo ADRC Grant [P50 AG16574]
  3. State of Florida Alzheimer's Disease Initiative
  4. Robert and Clarice Smith and Abigail Van Buren Alzheimer's Disease Research Program fellowship
  5. Mayo Clinic ADRC Pilot grant
  6. Robert E Jacoby Professorship for Alzheimer's Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hippocampal sclerosis of the elderly (HpScl) and Alzheimer's disease (AD), especially the limbic-predominant subtype (LP-AD), are amnestic syndromes that can be difficult to distinguish. To complicate matters, a subset has concomitant HpScl and AD (HpScl-AD). We examined a large cohort of autopsy-confirmed cases of HpScl, HpScl-AD, LP-AD, and typical AD to identify distinct clinical, genetic, and pathologic characteristics. HpScl cases were significantly older at death and had a substantially slower rate of cognitive decline than the AD subtypes. Genetic analysis revealed that the AD groups (AD, LP-AD, and HpScl-AD) were more likely to be APOE epsilon 4 carriers. In contrast, the HpScl groups (HpScl and HpScl-AD) were more likely to exhibit genetic variants in GRN and TMEM106B that are associated with frontotemporal lobar degeneration. The HpScl groups had a high frequency of TDP-43 pathology that was most often Type A morphology and distribution, while typical AD and LP-AD had a significantly lower frequency of TDP-43 pathology that was most often Type B. These results suggest that HpScl and AD are pathologically and genetically distinct and non-synergistic neurodegenerative processes that present with amnestic dementia. Pure HpScl and HpScl with concomitant AD occur most often in elderly individuals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据