4.6 Article

Inner ear lesions in congenital cytomegalovirus infection of human fetuses

期刊

ACTA NEUROPATHOLOGICA
卷 122, 期 6, 页码 763-774

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00401-011-0895-y

关键词

Congenital CMV infection; Sensorineural hearing loss; Potassium recycling; Stria vascularis

资金

  1. Inserm
  2. University Paris Diderot-Paris

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is the leading cause of non-hereditary congenital sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). The natural course and the pathophysiology of inner ear lesions during human fetal CMV infection have not yet been reported. Inner ear lesions were investigated in six CMV-infected fetuses aged 19-35 postconceptional weeks and correlated with central nervous system (CNS) lesions. All the fetuses had high viral loads in the amniotic fluid and severe visceral and CNS lesions visible by ultrasound. Diffuse lesions consisting of both cytomegalic cells containing inclusion bodies and inflammation were found within all studied structures including the inner ear, brain, other organs, and placenta, suggesting hematogenous dissemination. Cochlear infection was consistently present and predominated in the stria vascularis (5/6), whereas the supporting cells in the organ of Corti were less often involved (2/6). Vestibular infection, found in 4/6 cases, was florid; the non-sensory epithelia, including the dark cells, were extensively infected. The endolymphatic sac was infected in 1 of 3 cases. The severity of inner ear infection was correlated with the CNS lesions, confirming the neurotropism of CMV. This study documenting infection of the structures involved in endolymph secretion and potassium homeostasis in fetuses with high amniotic fluid viral loads suggests that potassium dysregulation in the endolymphatic compartment of the inner ear may lead to secondary degeneration of the sensory structures. In addition, the occurrence of SNHL depends on the intensity and duration of the viral infection and inflammation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据