4.3 Article

Noun-noun compounds for fictive food products: Experimenting in the borderzone of semantics and pragmatics

期刊

JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS
卷 42, 期 10, 页码 2799-2813

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.03.011

关键词

Semantics-pragmatics boundary; Noun-noun compounds; Default interpretation; Sentential context; Producer-consumer communication

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We performed a set of experiments dealing with the interpretation of novel Place-Food noun-noun compounds (NNCs) denoting fictive food products, in Danish. These were used in order to address concerns of linguistic theory, in particular the interrelation between semantics and pragmatics, psycholinguistics-investigating the role of sentential context for the interpretation of noun-noun compounds, and consumer oriented food labeling research. In the first experiment, a significant proportion of the novel NNCs was found to have a pre-contextually biased interpretation, in the majority of the cases conforming to what is usually considered the default interpretation for the studied type of compounds: FOOD ORIGINATING IN PLACE. In a subsequent experiment, this was however found to be easily overturned when sentential context supported what was initially found to be the least preferred interpretation. This contrasts with previous research comparing the role of such context on conventional NNCs. This suggests a qualitative difference between novel pre-contextually biased NNCs and conventional NNCs, and has implications for the semantics-pragmatics boundary, which we discuss. Furthermore, the three types of interpretations offered to the participants: ORIGINATING IN, RECIPE FROM and REMINDS OF, were shown to form an implicational hierarchy, which could explain the asymmetric preferences attributed to them by the participants in the experiments. (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据