4.6 Article

Mitochondrial biogenesis and fission in axons in cell culture and animal models of diabetic neuropathy

期刊

ACTA NEUROPATHOLOGICA
卷 120, 期 4, 页码 477-489

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00401-010-0697-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation
  2. American Diabetes Association
  3. Animal Models of Diabetes Complications Consortium (AMDCC) [NIH UO1 DK076160]
  4. Program for Neurology Research and Discovery
  5. A. Alfred Taubman Medical Institute
  6. Instituto Superiore di Sanita
  7. FIRB

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mitochondrial-mediated oxidative stress in response to high glucose is proposed as a primary cause of dorsal root ganglia (DRG) neuron injury in the pathogenesis of diabetic neuropathy. In the present study, we report a greater number of mitochondria in both myelinated and unmyelinated dorsal root axons in a well-established model of murine diabetic neuropathy. No similar changes were seen in younger diabetic animals without neuropathy or in the ventral motor roots of any diabetic animals. These findings led us to examine mitochondrial biogenesis and fission in response to hyperglycemia in the neurites of cultured DRG neurons. We demonstrate overall mitochondrial biogenesis via increases in mitochondrial transcription factors and increases in mitochondrial DNA in both DRG neurons and axons. However, this process occurs over a longer time period than a rapidly observed increase in the number of mitochondria in DRG neurites that appears to result, at least in part, from mitochondrial fission. We conclude that during acute hyperglycemia, mitochondrial fission is a prominent response, and excessive mitochondrial fission may result in dysregulation of energy production, activation of caspase 3, and subsequent DRG neuron injury. During more prolonged hyperglycemia, there is evidence of compensatory mitochondrial biogenesis in axons. Our data suggest that an imbalance between mitochondrial biogenesis and fission may play a role in the pathogenesis of diabetic neuropathy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据