4.6 Article

Prion protein amyloidosis with divergent phenotype associated with two novel nonsense mutations in PRNP

期刊

ACTA NEUROPATHOLOGICA
卷 119, 期 2, 页码 189-197

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00401-009-0609-x

关键词

Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease; Prion; Amyloid; Gerstmann-Straussler-Scheinker disease; Tau protein; Angiopathy

资金

  1. NBB
  2. Gino Galletti Foundation
  3. Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu
  4. Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stop codon mutations in the gene encoding the prion protein (PRNP) are very rare and have thus far only been described in two patients with prion protein cerebral amyloid angiopathy (PrP-CAA). In this report, we describe the clinical, histopathological and pathological prion protein (PrP(Sc)) characteristics of two Dutch patients carrying novel adjacent stop codon mutations in the C-terminal part of PRNP, resulting in either case in hereditary prion protein amyloidoses, but with strikingly different clinicopathological phenotypes. The patient with the shortest disease duration (27 months) carried a Y226X mutation and showed PrP-CAA without any neurofibrillary lesions, whereas the patient with the longest disease duration (72 months) had a Q227X mutation and showed an unusual Gerstmann-Straussler-Scheinker disease phenotype with numerous cerebral multicentric amyloid plaques and severe neurofibrillary lesions without PrP-CAA. Western blot analysis in the patient with the Q227X mutation demonstrated the presence of a 7 kDa unglycosylated PrP(Sc) fragment truncated at both the N- and C-terminal ends. Our observations expand the spectrum of clinicopathological phenotypes associated with PRNP mutations and show that a single tyrosine residue difference in the PrP C-terminus may significantly affect the site of amyloid deposition and the overall phenotypic expression of the prion disease. Furthermore, it confirms that the absence of the glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor in PrP predisposes to amyloid plaque formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据