4.3 Article

Attention and CERAD test performances in cognitively impaired elderly subjects

期刊

ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA
卷 131, 期 6, 页码 364-371

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ane.12346

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; depression; mild cognitive impairment; neuropsychology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectivesAttention plays a fundamental role in cognitive performance and is closely interrelated with all major cognitive domains. In this retrospective study, we correlated different measures of attention with standard cognitive parameters in 85 cognitively impaired elderly individuals presenting with cognitive complaints to a memory clinic. Materials and MethodsZ-scores of all relevant cognitive parameters of a extended Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's disease (CERAD-Plus) neuropsychological battery were correlated with tonic and phasic alertness, inhibition, and divided attention, assessed by a computerized test battery of attention. The pooled sample consisted of 36 patients with the diagnosis of mild AD, 30 patients with mild cognitive impairment, and 19 patients with major depressive disorder. ResultsSubjects of all diagnostic groups exhibited normal results in all subtests of attention. Reaction times of neither the tonic nor the phasic alertness task were correlated with any parameter of memory and global cognition. However, significant correlations were obtained between reaction times in the alertness tasks and the trail-making tests. Omissions in the divided attention task yielded the strongest correlations with deficits in cognitive performance, particularly in the verbal learning tasks, the Boston naming test, and the trail-making tests. ConclusionsOur data demonstrate the relative independency of the CERAD-Plus on the variability of attention and particularly alertness suggesting its robustness in psychiatric memory clinic settings. Moreover, CERAD-Plus subtests correlated considerably with failure rates in divided attention, suggesting that impairment in divided attention tasks may be early markers of cognitive impairment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据