4.3 Article

Antititin antibody in early- and late-onset myasthenia gravis

期刊

ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA
卷 130, 期 4, 页码 229-233

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/ane.12271

关键词

antititin antibody; course of myasthenia early onset; late onset; myasthenia gravis; thymoma

资金

  1. Polish-Norwegian Research Fund [PNRF-204-AI-1/07]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectivesMyasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease caused by antibodies against neuromuscular junction proteins, 85% of patients have antibodies against acetylcholine receptor (AChR-MG). Antititin antibodies are present in a subset of patients with MG. We aimed to determine the value of antititin antibodies as severity markers and thymoma predictors in early- and late-onset MG. Materials & methodsTwo-hundred and ninety-five consecutive MG patients (188F and 107M) aged 12-89years (mean 50y) were included. 164 patients had early-onset (EOMG, 50years of age), 131 had late-onset MG (LOMG). Twenty-six patients had thymoma. symptoms, severity graded with MGFA scale, thymus histology, medications, and treatment results were analyzed. ResultsAntititin antibodies were present in 81 (27%) of all patients: 54% of thymoma MG, 0.6% of non-thymomatous EOMG, and 55% of LOMG, with proportion of titin-positive patients increasing linearly from 40% in the 6th to 88% in the 9th decade of life. Titin-positive patients had more bulbar symptoms (P=0.003). Severity of MG, need for immunosuppression, myasthenic crisis risk or treatment results were not related to its presence. Antititin antibodies had 56% sensitivity, 99% specificity, 90% positive predictive value (PPV), and 95% negative predictive value (NPV) for thymoma diagnosis in EOMG, and 50% sensitivity, 75% specificity, 71% PPV and 55% NPV in LOMG. ConclusionsAntititin antibodies have high PPV and NPV for thymoma in EOMG. In MG without thymoma, antititin antibodies can be considered as markers of LOMG, but not of a severe course in our MG cohort.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据