4.4 Article

Recurrent craniopharyngiomas in children and adults: long-term recurrence rate and management

期刊

ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA
卷 156, 期 1, 页码 113-122

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00701-013-1938-z

关键词

Craniopharyngioma; Recurrence rate; Surgery; Radiation treatment

资金

  1. Ministry of Education of the Slovak Republic
  2. Slovak Academy of Sciences (VEGA) [1/1166/10]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The significance of the majority of the factors influencing the recurrence rate (RR) of craniopharyngiomas remains unclear, and the management of this significance is controversial. The present study aimed to evaluate the influence of patient age and tumor topography on the RR, the efficacy of radiotherapy, and the safety of surgery for recurrences. The RR was analyzed in 38 children (follow-up, 2-256 months [mean, 147.6]) and 63 adults (follow-up, 2-221 months [mean, 100.2]. The efficacy of 18 sessions of radiotherapy (13 patients) and the outcome of 52 secondary surgeries (37 patients) were evaluated. The RR reached 39.5 % in children and 22.2 % in adults (p = 0.053). After radical tumor removal, the RR in children (36.7 %) was significantly higher (p = 0.024) than that in adults (14 %). In children after radical removal of intraventricular and extraventricular craniopharyngiomas (IECs), the RR was higher (60 %; p = 0.071) than in extraventricular (intrasellar and suprasellar; purely suprasellar extraventricular) tumors (25 %). Radical removal of 50 % of tumors was achieved (73.1 % in children; 26.9 % in adults; p = 0.002) in 56.7 % of the first and 40.9 % of further recurrences. There was no early mortality after 52 surgeries; functional worsening (endocrine, 2; obesity, 2; visual, 3) occurred after 7/52 secondary surgeries. Recurrence occurred after 9/18 sessions of radiotherapy. The RR was higher in children than in adults and in IECs relative to other topographic groups. Children with IECs represent a risk group. The efficacy of radiotherapy was inconclusive. Early detection of recurrences enabled safe excision with low morbidity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据