4.4 Article

Metabolic failure precedes intracranial pressure rises in traumatic brain injury: a microdialysis study

期刊

ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA
卷 150, 期 5, 页码 461-470

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00701-008-1580-3

关键词

glutamate; glycerol; ICP; lactate; pyruvate ratio; microdialysis; traumatic brain injury

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [G0701458] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Cerebral microdialysis (MD) is able to detect markers of tissue damage and cerebral ischaemia and can be used to monitor the biochemical changes subsequent to head injury. In this prospective, observational study we analysed the correlation between microdialysis markers of metabolic impairment and intracranial pressure (ICP) and investigated whether changes in biomarker concentration precede rises in ICP. Methods: MD and ICP monitoring was carried out in twenty-five patients with severe TBI in Neurointensive care. MD samples were analysed hourly for lactate:pyruvate (LP) ratio, glutamate and glycerol. Abnormal values of microdialysis variables in presence of normal ICP were used to calculate the risk of intracranial hypertension developing within the next 3h. Findings: An LP ratio > 25 and glycerol > 100 mu mol/L, but not glutamate > 12 mu mol/L, were associated with significantly higher risk of imminent intracranial hypertension (odds ratio: 9.8, CI 5.8-16.1; 2.2, CI 1.6-3.8; 1.7, CI 0.6-3, respectively). An abnormal LP ratio could predict an ICP rise above normal levels in 89% of cases, whereas glycerol and glutamate had a poorer predictive value. Conclusions: Changes in the compound concentrations in microdialysate are a useful tool to describe molecular events triggered by TBI. These changes can occur before the onset of intracranial hypertension, suggesting that biochemical impairment can be present before low cerebral perfusion pressure is detectable. This early warning could be exploited to expand the window for therapeutic intervention.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据