4.2 Article

Is Race-Neutral Really Race-Neutral?: Disparate Impact Towards Underrepresented Minorities in Post-209 UC System Admissions

期刊

JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION
卷 81, 期 6, 页码 605-+

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2010.11779074

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Is Race-Neutral Really Race-Neutral?: Disparate Impact Towards Underrepresented Minorities in Post-209 UC System Admissions Authors examine the proportion of undergraduate applications, admissions, and enrollments preceding, during, and after Proposition 209 while accounting for the relative growth in University of California eligibility for underrepresented minorities (URMs). They employed standard deviation analyses to measure dispersion of the URMs to non-URMs. Results suggest that disparate impact towards URMs persists, the magnitude is large, and affirmative action alone is insufficient to ensure an equitable admissions process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据