4.7 Article

Anisotropic plastic deformation of single crystals of the MAX phase compound Ti3SiC2 investigated by micropillar compression

期刊

ACTA MATERIALIA
卷 161, 期 -, 页码 161-170

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.09.024

关键词

MAX phase; Mechanical properties; Micropillar compression; Deformation structures; Dislocations

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP15H02300, JP17K18987, JP26289258, JP26109712, JP18H01735, JP18H05478, JP18H05450, JP18H05451]
  2. Elements Strategy Initiative for Structural Materials (ESISM) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan
  3. JST-ALCA [JPMJAL1004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The anisotropic deformation behavior of single crystals of Ti3SiC2 has been investigated at room temperature as a function of loading axis orientation and specimen size by micropillar compression tests. Basal slip is found to be only the operative slip system at room temperature. The a/3[1 (2) over bar 10] basal dislocation responsible for basal slip dissociates into two partial dislocations of the Shockley-type and glides between Ti1 and Si atomic layers, as confirmed both experimentally and theoretically. The CRSS value for basal slip increases with the decrease in the specimen size, following an inverse power-law relationship with a very large power-law exponent of about 1.0, which is almost the upper limit of those reported for FCC metals. When the loading axis is parallel to the basal plane, kink band formation occurs only after the occurrence of basal-plane delamination and the subsequent activation of a -dislocations gliding on the basal plane. Kink bands consists of a/3[1 (2) over bar 10] basal edge dislocations of the same sign, each of which had glided between Ti1 and Si atomic layers. These results indicates that the kink formation can simply be interpreted by the classical dislocation-based kink-formation model. (C) 2018 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据