4.7 Article

Enhanced cyclic deformation responses of ultrafine-grained Cu and nanocrystalline Cu-Al alloys

期刊

ACTA MATERIALIA
卷 74, 期 -, 页码 200-214

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.04.053

关键词

Ultrafine-grained Cu; Nanocrystalline Cu-Al alloys; Stacking fault energy; Cyclic softening; Fatigue damage mechanism

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [50890173, 50931005, 51101162, 51331007]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2010CB631006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cyclic deformation responses of ultrafine-grained (UFG) Cu and nanocrystalline (NC) Cu Al alloys produced by equal channel angular pressing were investigated systematically by applying low-cycle fatigue (LCF) and high-cycle fatigue (HCF) tests. Based on the dependence of the fatigue life (N-f) on the total strain amplitude (Delta epsilon(t)/2) and stress amplitude (Delta sigma/2) in comparison with that of UFG Cu, the LCF life and HCF strength, especially fatigue endurance limits, of NC Cu Al alloys, were enhanced strikingly at the same time as their stacking fault energies (SFE) decreased. These upgraded fatigue performances with lowering of the SFE in NC Cu Al alloys can be attributed not only to the simultaneous increase in their monotonic strength and ductility on the macroscale, but also to the crucially decreased cyclic softening behavior on the microscale. It was found that substantial grain growth and large-scale shear bands, both of which are essential ingredients, resulting in significant cyclic softening and then deterioration in the LCF life of UFG and NC materials, were reduced advantageously on decreasing the SFE in NC Cu-Al alloys. Moreover, the dominant fatigue damage micro-mechanism was also transformed inherently from extensive grain boundary (GB) migration in UFG Cu to other local GB activities such as atom shuffling or GB sliding/rotation in NC Cu Al alloy with low SFE. (C) 2014 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据