4.7 Article

The structural transitions of Ti3AlC2 induced by ion irradiation

期刊

ACTA MATERIALIA
卷 65, 期 -, 页码 351-359

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.11.002

关键词

Irradiation effect; Order-to-disorder phase transformations; Electron diffraction pattern; Ceramics

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2010CB832904, 2008CB717803]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11075005, 91226202]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KJCX2-EW-H06]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The structural transitions of Ti3AlC2 induced by ion irradiation were investigated over a wide fluence range by transmission electron microscopy. No amorphization occurs even at the highest dose of 31 dpa, indicating a great tolerance to irradiation-induced amorphization. Dynamic electron diffraction simulations and high-resolution observations indicate that the nanolamellar structure of Ti3AlC2 is readily destroyed through the formation of antisite defects and a phase transformation from alpha-Ti3AlC2 to beta-Ti3AlC2 occurs at 2.61 dpa. A great number of stacking faults in basal planes are formed with increasing fluence, leading to the formation of nano Ti3AlC2 grains with different stacking sequences at 10.45 dpa. Serious structural damage and polygonization are observed at the highest dose of 31 dpa. Due to the similar structural transition process with some complex oxides (pyrochlore and murataite), it is assumed that the great irradiation tolerance of Ti3AlC2 results from the low formation energy of antisite defects. These findings first clarify the structural transition mechanism of Ti3AlC2 under ion irradiation and its relationship with irradiation tolerance, which is of vital importance in understanding the irradiation response of MAX phases and provides a clue in searching for materials with higher irradiation tolerance from MAX phases. (C) 2013 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据