4.7 Article

Experimental evidence of hydrogen-oxygen decoupled diffusion into BaZr0.6Ce0.25Y0.15O3-δ

期刊

ACTA MATERIALIA
卷 61, 期 4, 页码 1274-1283

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.11.003

关键词

Proton conductor; BaZr0.6Ce0.25Y0.15O3-delta; Conductivity relaxation

资金

  1. Fusion Research Program for Green Technologies through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2011-0019303]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The electrical properties of BaZr0.6Ce0.25Y0.15O3-delta (BZCY) were studied as a function of both oxygen partial pressure (-2.65 <= log(P-O2 atm(-1)) <= -0.62) and water vapor activity (-3.33 <= log(P-H2O atm(-1) <= -1.3)) in the temperature range of 973-1073 K. The total conductivity slightly increased in reducing atmospheres with increasing water vapor activity because of the relative contribution to the total conductivity by the redox reaction at the given thermodynamic conditions. The partial conductivities of protons, holes and oxygen vacancies were successfully calculated, and the activation energy determined for proton transport was 0.3+/-0.1 eV. The chemical diffusivity of oxygen at a fixed water vapor activity, (D) over tilde (vO), could only be evaluated from Fick's second law during oxidation and reduction at the fixed water vapor activity. However, twofold nonmonotonic conductivity relaxation behaviors were clearly confirmed in the temperature range investigated during hydration/dehydration. If P-O2 represents the fixed oxygen partial pressure, (D) over tilde (iH) is the hydrogen chemical diffusivity at P-O2 and (D) over tilde (vH) is the oxygen chemical diffusivity at P-O2, it was observed that (D) over tilde (iH) > (D) over tilde (vH) at all experimental conditions, suggesting that the hydrogen chemical diffusion is always faster than oxygen on hydration/dehydration in the temperature range studied. (C) 2012 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据